HC Deb 17 March 1970 vol 798 cc179-80
9. Mr. Ogden

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will state the annual yield to the Treasury from motor vehicle registration fees for each of the past five years, and give his estimate of the annual yield for each of the next five years on the basis that the licence fee was reduced by £2 10s., £5 and £7 10s., respectively.

Mr. Diamond

With permission, I will circulate the figures for the last five years in the OFFICIAL REPORT. It is not possible to make any accurate forecast five years ahead on the basis of alternative rates of duty.

Mr. Ogden

Is my right hon. Friend aware that that tells me nothing at this time and therefore I decline to ask a supplementary question?

Mr. Arthur Lewis

As so many thousands are not paying the fees, would it not be better to drop it altogether? That would be the easiest way out for all concerned.

Mr. Diamond

I must ask my hon. Friend the Member for West Ham, North (Mr. Arthur Lewis) to keep this matter in proportion.

Following are the figures:

Current 1964–65
prices prices
£m. £m.
1964–65 187 187
1965–66 245 235
1966–67 262 243
1967–68 283 254
1968–69 401 351
1969–70 (estimated) 422 355

10. Mr. Ogden

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what consideration he is giving to proposals to reduce the motor vehicle licence registration fees.

Mr. Diamond

My right hon. Friend will bear in mind the proposals that have been made when he is considering his Budget statement.

Mr. Ogden

Is my right hon. Friend aware that I have asked a similar Question to this one for the last four years? Does he not think it time that virtue and diligence were rewarded and that if there were an attempt to reduce the tax on registration fee it would mean that those who use most petrol would pay most in tax?

Sir G. Nabarro

That is better than putting it up to £35.

Mr. Diamond

My hon. Friend, who is to be congratulated on his consistency, will remember and recognise the various arguments which apply if one is thinking of changing the tax on petrol as opposed to what is before us now. This is too long a subject to go into in Question and Answer.