§ 25. Mr. Peter Archerasked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what reply he intends to send the Secretary-General of the United Nations on the feasibility of an international treaty on marine pollution, pursuant to General Assembly Resolution No. 2556
§ Mr. LuardWe are still considering our reply to the Secretary-General's inquiry and I am not yet able to make a statement.
§ Mr. ArcherWould my hon. Friend at least agree that, while it may take a little time to secure international agreement on territorial claims over the ocean, it is only common sense to agree not to poison the cake before we divide it?
§ Mr. LuardI can assure my hon. Friend that we are truly concerned about the problem of pollution at sea. He will know that we have already played a prominent part in bringing about agreement on earlier conventions for the prevention of pollution of the sea by oil—in 1954 and 1963. We shall continue our efforts in this direction.
§ Mr. Wingfield DigbyIs not the main problem one of enforceability?
§ Mr. LuardIt is perfectly true that this is one of the main problems. On this question I.M.C.O.—the United Nations organisation mainly responsible—has been undertaking discussions.