§ 10. Mr. Boyd-Carpenterasked the Chancellor of the Exchequer when 3s. was fixed as the limit beyond which luncheon vouchers issued by an employer to his employees would be treated as taxable in the hands of the employee.
§ Mr. TaverneIn 1948.
§ Mr. Boyd-CarpenterIn view of the lapse of 21 years, if 3s. was then the right figure, fixed by the then Labour Government, should it not be much higher now?
§ Mr. TaverneNo, Sir. This can be viewed in a number of ways. In the first place, one has to consider those who have to pay in full for their meals; in the second, it puts those who receive luncheon vouchers in no more advantageous a position than those who enjoy the benefits of a subsidised canteen.
§ Mr. LiptonIs my hon. and learned Friend aware that this method of subsidising wages is unnecessary and out of date and that it should be replaced by a more satisfactory wage structure, which would make all these niggling forms of subsidy unnecessary?
§ Mr. TaverneThis is in some ways anomalous, but it has existed for a long time and its withdrawal would be resented. But I accept that that is a good reason for not extending the system.