§ 1. Mr. Martenasked the Secretary of State for Defence if he will make a statement on the future of defence facilities in Libya.
§ 19. Mr. Farrasked the Secretary of State for Defence if he will make a statement on the future of British service establishments in Libya.
§ 25. Sir G. Nabarroasked the Secretary of State for Defence whether he will make a statement on the evacuation of British bases in Libya.
§ 32. Mr. John Fraserasked the Secretary of State for Defence whether he will make a statement about the future of training bases in Libya.
§ 39. Mr. Dalyellasked the Secretary of State for Defence what negotiations he has had with the Libyan Government on the future of El Adem.
§ 58. Mr. Ramsdenasked the Secretary of State for Defence what agreement has been reached with the Libyan Government over stationing of British forces at Tobruk and El Adem.
§ 59. Mr. Liptonasked the Secretary of State for Defence what decision he has taken about the future of British service installations in Libya.
§ The Minister of Defence for Administration (Mr. Roy Hattersley)First, I apologise for the absence of my right 1458 hon. Friend the Secretary of State, who is away on Government business.
The negotiations with the Libyan Government envisaged by my right hon. Friend the Foreign and Commonwealth Secretary in his reply to Questions on 17th November are expected to begin on 8th December. These negotiations will include, among other questions, our relations with Libya in the defence field. —[Vol. 791, c. 848.]
§ Mr. MartenWill the Minister particularly bear in mind in those negotiations the need to keep an alternative east-about air route for the Far East? Is the question of the supply of air defence equipment and Chieftain tanks in those negotiations, or is it being kept as a separate issue?
§ Mr. HattersleyThe negotiations will include all aspects of our future and past defence arrangements with Libya. Therefore, the hon. Gentleman can rest assured that all the points he makes will be borne in mind.
§ Mr. FarrIf the negotiations bring about the removal of our defence facilities in Libya, will consideration be given to their re-establishment in Malta?
§ Mr. HattersleyI do not want to make any comments on what might happen if one set of circumstances operates after the negotiations.
§ Sir G. NabarroWill the Minister apply his mind to the fact that both Malta and Gibraltar are anxious, willing and able to accommodate additional British defence forces of all three Service arms, and have often expressed their anxiety to do so in recent years?
§ Mr. HattersleyI will apply my mind to any point the hon. Gentleman makes to me, but I will not comment about it before the negotiations.
§ Mr. RamsdenIs it a fact that at present, pending the commencement of negotiations, some British forces and their dependants are virtually immobilised in Libya? Can anything be done about this as a matter of urgency?
§ Mr. HattersleyThe description "virtually immobilised" is perhaps too extreme, but we accepted certain suggestions made to us by the Libyan Government. That, too, will be one of the things discussed on 8th December.
§ Mr. LiptonMay we have an assurance that Her Majesty's Government will not indulge in too much grovelling in return for unreliable favours from the Government of Libya?
Mr. HartersleyMy hon. Friend can rest absolutely assured that we shall not indulge in too much grovelling.