§ 7. Mr. Lubbockasked the Minister of Transport what factors he takes into consideration in appointing members of transport users' consultative committees.
§ Mr. MarshIn accordance with Section 56 of the Transport Act, 1962, I appoint the Chairman and two members of each Committee without consultation. My choice is influenced mainly by individual ability and experience. I appoint the other members after consulting organisations which are representative of a variety of transport users. I consider the suitability of their nominees in terms of age and experience, the need to avoid overlarge committees, and the geographical distribution of membership.
§ Mr. LubbockIs the right hon. Gentleman aware that there is only one season ticket holder in the whole of the membership of the South-Eastern T.U.C.C.? Does not he agree that, among the organisations which should be consulted in deciding who to appoint to these committees, the organisations representing passengers, such as the Orpington District Railway Passengers' Association, should be consulted? Will he ensure that such a provision is written into the Transport 16 (London) Bill when the consultative machinery comes to be discussed?
§ Mr. MarshA very large number of bodies are consulted. They make their nominations and one of the biggest problems is having to limit the sheer size of such an organisation. I do not know how many of the members hold season tickets but quite obviously a very large proportion probably travel by train.
§ Mr. DribergWill my right hon. Friend confirm that it is the primary job of these committees to represent the consumer—the passenger—vis-à-vis British Railways and the Ministry, and that it is not primarily their job to take account of costings?
§ Mr. MarshThey are there to represent the transport users. The costs of services are obviously involved. A wide range of organisations are consulted.