§ Q4. Mr. Hefferasked the Prime Minister what further steps are being taken to follow up the proposals contained in the communiqu8é following his visit to Moscow for a European Security Conference; and if he will make a statement.
§ The Prime MinisterI would refer my hon. Friend to the Answer given on 28th February by my right hon. Friend the Foreign Secretary to a Question by my hon. Friend the Member for Salford, East (Mr. Frank Allaun).—[Vol. 759, c. 224.]
§ Mr. HefferIs my right hon. Friend aware that 191 hon. Members have signed a Motion supporting the contents of the communiqué? Is he aware that we believe this is one of the most hopeful and imaginative ideas that has come out of the visit to Moscow? Will he indicate whether any sort of discussions are going on which can help towards a European Security Conference?
§ The Prime MinisterMr. Kosygin and I, not only in this year's meeting in Moscow, but a year ago in London, agreed on the idea of a European Security Conference, but we both felt that it must be properly prepared. While we have now agreed, this year, unlike last year, to have discussions between us, we have also agreed that those discussions cannot be exclusive; we have to talk with friends and allies on this question just as he will have people to consult.
§ Mr. HeathI entirely agree with the Prime Minister about the need for 1755 preparation. I am sure he realises that it is the division of Germany which lies at the heart of the question of European security. Has the Prime Minister any fresh ideas in mind to help to a solution of this problem?
§ The Prime MinisterNo. There are two views each side of the Iron Curtain on this question. The communiqué said that all European countries should be among those concerned—but it would take a great deal of preparation and prior negotiation to reach agreement between those in the East and those in the West on whether East Germany is a country or not. We have taken the other view.