§ 1. Mr. Martenasked the Secretary of State for Defence if he will redefine the clasification of information about Polaris warheads.
§ Mr. MartenIf the multiple warhead is now fitted on to our Polaris, is it not true that the more we talk about it in terms of a deterrent, the better; or is it true that the Government agree with the 1316 Lord President of the Council that Britain's role is to be a spokesman for the non-nuclear powers? Could we have an answer to both those questions?
§ Mr. MasonI am sorry to inform the hon. Gentleman that it would not be right for me to talk about what is a highly cassified matter. Classification standards were agreed with the Americans in the 1958 Exchange Agreement. They still stand. They have worked amicably, and I do not see any reason to lower them.
§ Mr. Emrys HughesHow far does the Minister agree with the Prime Minister's statement yesterday that the use of nuclear weapons was sheer adjectival lunacy?
§ Mr. MasonI agree precisely with what he said yesterday and with his reiteration of what he said in Washington.