HC Deb 01 April 1968 vol 762 cc20-1
24. Mr. Biggs-Davison

asked the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs what reply Her Majesty's Government have received to their further approach to the Soviet Government with a view to securing the release of Herr Rudolf Hess from Spandau.

Mr. Mulley

As my hon. Friend the Under-Secretary informed the House on 26th February—[Vol. 759, c. 914–5]—the Soviet Government have refused to agree to our further approach to secure the release of Herr Hess from Spandau.

Mr. Biggs-Davison

For how long do Her Majesty's Government intend to wait? Are the Western Powers considering any action on their own account?

Mr. Mulley

The hon. Gentleman knows that this is the result of a four-Power agreement and that a change can be effected only with the agreement of the four Powers concerned. In the meantime, we are considering the possibility of reaching agreement on less elaborate methods of detention for Herr Hess.

Mr. Molloy

Since even this week some of the appalling atrocities and vulgarities which were perpetrated by the Nazi régime are coming to light, will my right hon. Friend ensure that this matter is not given any priority whatever?

Mr. Mulley

It is not a question of priorities. We feel, for many reasons, that it would be sensible for Herr Hess to be released.

Mr. G. Campbell

Since Hess's solitary confinement was never intended but has occurred because all the other prisoners were released from Spandau, will the right hon. Gentleman press this matter further with the Soviet Union?

Mr. Mulley

All the arguments adduced have been put to the Soviet Ur ion, but their answer is "No".