HC Deb 23 November 1967 vol 754 cc1473-4
41. Mr. Russell Kerr

asked the Postmaster-General what criteria are applied by his Department in determining the suitability of an area for a post office rather than a sub-post office.

Mr. Joseph Slater

The main criterion is the provision of an adequate service by the most economic means. Because the overheads are normally shared by the private business, sub-post offices are generally more economical than Crown offices and it is not now our policy to provide Crown offices except in large shopping and commercial centres.

Mr. Kerr

Is my hon. Friend aware that the sub-post office facilities in Bed-font, in my constituency, which has a population of about 12,000, are wholly inadequate and, indeed, recently were wholly non-existent? Will his Department reconsider the recent decision to refuse a full Crown post office for Bed-font?

Mr. Slater

I know of the interest that my hon. Friend has had in this matter by the way he has pursued it over the last few weeks. I must, however, tell him that when the previous sub-postmaster gave notice, we had difficulty in finding a successor. To provide continuity of service, a new office had to be opened at short notice. I recognise that the accommodation so hastily provided last month was not at first satisfactory, but it has now been improved and the sub-postmaster is planning to extend his premises. I sincerely hope that what has already taken place and what is to be done will improve the services in my hon. Friend's constituency.