§ Mr. SpeakerI think that It is the feeling of the House that we might have a general debate on all the Prayers that are before us this morning. I must point out, however, that we cannot debate today Motion No. 20 which is on the Order Paper for tomorrow.
§ Mr. RipponIt would be convenient, I am sure, Mr. Speaker, to discuss not only the Prayers but the Government Motions. I understand that there is a difficulty about notice to withdraw but, of course, it is part of the substance of our argument that the Regulations should be annulled because the appointed day is too soon. I imagine that a general debate will be acceptable.
§ Mr. SpeakerThe right hon. and learned Gentleman will have to make his comment about the appointed day tomorrow. We cannot discuss this morning what is on tomorrow's Order Paper. I know that it is rather difficult.
§ Mr. Boyd-CarpenterI gather from what you have said, Mr. Speaker, that it would be in order to deal with any of the issues raised either on the Government's Motions or on the Opposition Prayers—for example, the rate of levy.
§ Mr. SpeakerWe can debate everything except Motion No. 20, which is on the Order Paper for tomorrow. Perhaps I can help the House. If we proceed tomorrow—and I understand that the debate may pass over to tomorrow—Motion No. 20 will become part of the discussion.
The Minister of State, Ministry of Housing and Local Government (Mr. Frederick Wiley)It might assist the House, Mr. Speaker, if I say that the Government would not mind a passing reference to the fact that these provisions all come into effect on 6th April.
§ Mr. SpeakerWhat the Government would or would not mind is not a matter for the Chair. This is purely a question of order.