§ The Lord President of the Council and Leader of the House of Commons (Mr. Richard Crossman)Following the exchanges after the Private Notice Question yesterday, I should like to make a short statement about the business announced for Thursday, 2nd February.
The proceedings on the Road Traffic Bill will be postponed.
Until about 7 p.m. there will be a debate on Malta. This will arise on a Motion for the Adjournment of the House and will be followed by the remaining stages of the West Indies Bill and the Road Safety Bill.
§ Mr. HeathI am sure the House will agree that the Leader of the House is right in arranging this debate for Thursday. We are grateful to him for it. It will enable the Government to explain their position and hon. Members to comment on the matter and consider where we go from there.
§ Sir A. V. HarveyWill the Leader of the House take note of the fact that there is widespread interest among hon. Members on both sides of the House about the problems of Malta? When account is taken of the Front Bench speakers, what time will be left for back bench Members to express their views on this very important matter?
§ Mr. CrossmanAs I put it to the House in reply to the Private Notice Question, we sometimes have a choice between an early and topical debate on an important subject, and all the time we want. I would have thought it wise to have the debate as early as possible, even if it were short. I hope that it will be possible to get some back benchers in.
§ Sir C. TaylorSurely, on the subject of Malta, which has provoked widespread interest throughout the country, the House should have a full day's debate.
§ Mr. DeedesDo I understand that we are to have the remaining stages of the Road Safety Bill on Thursday? There is an enormous amount still to discuss on that Bill.
§ Mr. CrossmanThe proposal that I read was that we should do the West Indies Bill and the Road Safety Bill.
§ Mr. FisherIf we cannot have a full day's debate on Malta, may I suggest for the right hon. Gentleman's consideration that as it is only half a day we should have only one Front Bench speech from each side instead of two?—otherwise back benchers will not get in at all.
§ Mr. CrossmanThat is a point which we could perhaps consider through the usual channels. Certain suggestions were made, including one that there should be two Front Bench spokesmen, because some people felt that they wanted to hear not only from the Commonwealth Office but from the Defence Ministry. I understand the difficulties, however, and I promise to give this matter thought through the usual channels.
§ Mr. Ronald BellDoes not the right hon. Gentleman think that just hoping that some back benchers might get in is not good enough on a subject like this and that the business of the House must be arranged in such a way that it is certain that some back benchers will get in?
§ Mr. CrossmanIf that is the hon. and learned Gentleman's interpretation, I cannot have made it clear enough. Of course, that is the intention. We are now considering—and I said that I would consider it through the usual channels—whether we can ensure adequate debate with one Front Bench speaker on each side. There are advantages and disadvantages there, and I should like to consult through the usual channels.
§ Mr. SpeakerI hope that we can move on.
§ Sir Harwood HarrisonMay I remind the right hon. Gentleman that the Second Reading debate on the Road Safety Bill was curtailed by the Government, that we feel that this is an important subject and that it should be given adequate time on the Floor of the House?
§ Mr. CrossmanI will bear that in mind.
§ Mr. MappWould my right hon. Friend reconsider his position over the Road Traffic Bill? There is a series of Amendments which cut across political issues. In view of the lateness of the hour on a Thursday evening, the House will not be able, with the departure of 252 provincial Members, to go on. I hope that he will reconsider and put it on later next week.
§ Mr. CrossmanI could not have made myself clear. The Road Traffic Bill is postponed. We shall not discuss it on Thursday. It is the Road Safety Bill which we are having.
§ Mr. DeedesWe must get this clear. That is the Bill in question.
§ Mr. CrossmanI have said that there are two Bills. One is the Road Traffic Bill, which is postponed. The other is the Road Safety Bill—
§ Mr. DeedesThat is the important one.
§ Mr. Crossman—which will be taken, and which we hope to complete, on Thursday evening.
§ Mr. AwdryThe right hon. Gentleman still has this wrong, with respect. There will be a great deal of discussion on the Road Safety Bill. Would it not be more sensible to postpone it altogether—it is bound to go on a few hours—and deal with the other very vital matter which concerns all hon. Members?
§ Mr. CrossmanI think that the arrangement over Malta is satisfactory, but if there is strong feeling we shall certainly consider it through the usual channels.