§ 22. Mr. Fowlerasked the Minister of Health how the fees now received by ophthalmic opticians under the National Health Service compare with those received by them when the Service was introduced in 1948, both in monetary and in real value.
§ Mr. K. RobinsonAs the reply consists of a table of figures I will, with permission, circulate it in the OFFICIAL REPORT.
§ Mr. FowlerWhile I am grateful to the Minister for that reply, may I ask him whether he considers that the rise in remuneration has been commensurate with the rise in the cost of living and the rise in remuneration of other branches of the medical profession?
SUPPLEMENTARY OPHTHALMIC SERVICES | ||||||
SIGHT-TESTING AND DISPENSING FEES OF OPHTHALMIC OPTICIANS | ||||||
1948 fees | Current equivalent value of Column (i)* | Current fees operative from 1st September, 1964 | ||||
(i) | (ii) | (iii) | ||||
s. | d. | s. | d. | s. | d. | |
Sight-testing | ||||||
(a) By an ophthalmic optician who does not dispense glasses at all or who does not consider it necessary to prescribe glasses following a sight-test | 15 | 6 | 26 | 8 | 19 | 0 |
(b) By an ophthalmic optician in all other circumstances | 17 | 0 |
National Health service frames or other reglazed frames | Private frames | |||||||
s. | d. | s. | d. | |||||
Dispensirg | ||||||||
(a) General (single vision lenses) | 25 | 0 | 20 | 0 | ||||
(b) General (bi-focal lenses) | 33 | 0 | 29 | 0 | ||||
(c) One lens to applicant's own frame | 25 | 0 | 43 | 0 | 13 | 0 | N.A. | |
(d) For each additional pair of glasses where more than one pair prescribed | 10 | 6 | 8 | 6 | ||||
* i.e. Column (1) revalued to give the same purchasing power in the last quarter of 1965, on the basis of the Consumer Price Index. |