§ 6. Mr. Evelyn Kingasked the Secretary of State for Defence why his Department did not carry out the undertaking given, prior to enlistment, to Junior Technician D. Burlin, K.1944089, in respect of the 61 days' leave in Rhodesia to which he was entitled.
§ The Under-Secretary of State for Defence for the Royal Air Force (Mr. Merlyn Rees)All leave in Rhodesia for members of the British Armed Services, other than for compassionate reasons, was cancelled in view of the illegal declaration of independence by Mr. Smith. A number of individuals have been allowed to take leave in Rhodesia for compassionate reasons. We are considering whether we would be justified in applying a broader interpretation to the compassionate factor, and the particular case referred to by the hon. Gentleman will be looked at in the light of this.
§ Mr. KingIs it not a fact that, whatever may have happened in Rhodesia, it is hardly the fault of Aircraftsman Burlin, or his ageing mother? I thank the hon. Gentleman for what he has said, but I add that if he were to deprive this aircraft-man, now that he is under military discipline, of an undertaking which was given to him prior to enlistment, the hon. Gentleman would be guilty of a very mean action.
§ Mr. ReesI assure the hon. Gentleman that we meant what was said in the Answer. This matter will be looked into again in the light of the review which is taking place.
§ Mr. PowellWhy does permission in these cases have to be dependent on compassionate considerations?
§ Mr. ReesBecause it is considered by my right hon. Friend that the rebellion in Rhodesia raises issues for members of the Armed Forces which make it desirable for them not to return there unless there are compassionate circumstances.