§ 2. Mr. Eldon Griffithsasked the Minister of Transport what plans he has for 384 the construction of a dual-carriage highway, following the general route of the A.45, east to west across East Anglia.
§ Mr. SwinglerOur long-term plan is to improve the existing road generally to dual carriageway standards with bypasses as required.
§ Mr. GriffithsWill the hon. Gentleman bear in mind that very little is to be gained by tackling this problem with a series of small bypasses to assist various towns along the way? What is really needed is for the Minister to think big in this matter so that we have a highway which will connect the industrial Midlands with the East Coast ports.
§ Mr. SwinglerOur job is to think in terms of traffic volumes on the roads and the requirements in terms of modern transport needs. These roads are being brought up to standard in accordance with the evidence of traffic volume that we have. As the hon. Member knows, a considerable number of schemes are now in hand.
§ 3. Mr. Eldon Griffithsasked the Minister of Transport if, in view of the congestion in the Port of London, he will improve the roads leading to Harwich, Ipswich, Yarmouth and King's Lynn, thus providing better facilities for Midlands industrialists to export and import to and from Western Europe.
§ 4. Mr. Ridsdaleasked the Minister of Transport if, in view of the congestion in the Port of London, he will improve the road leading to Harwich to help Midlands industrialists and others who export to and import from Western Europe.
§ Mr. SwinglerImprovements of these roads are being carried out as funds permit at places where the greatest benefit will be obtained.
§ Mr. GriffithsWould the hon. Gentleman bear in mind that we have, in recent months, seen some of the difficulties that arise as a result of the funnelling of so much of our export trade from the industrial Midlands through the Port of London? Would not the hon. Gentleman consider that a great deal might be gained by diverting some of this traffic, particularly that which goes to the Common Market countries and into the valley of the Rhine? Would it not be an improvement if some of this traffic were encouraged to go on an east-west route through 385 the developing ports of Ipswich and Harwich, which would ease congestion in London and make for much more effective shipment of our exports to the European nations?
§ Mr. SwinglerWe want to see a better distribution of traffic between the ports and also to see not only the roads but the railways better used, especially in East Anglia, to this effect.
§ Mr. RidsdaleIs the hon. Gentleman aware that the roads leading to Harwich are becoming a vital artery for our exports and that motor traffic on them, in terms of export value, has increased from £50 million to £300 million in the last few years? A lot of this traffic consists of caravans and car transporters, and we shall have a fatal accident very soon in our narrow country lanes along which this transport has to go. Will the hon. Gentleman's Department do something about it?
§ Mr. SwinglerSomething is being done about it. The hon. Gentleman should be aware that roadworks are in hand on the A.604 and the A.113 in order to improve them in relation to the volume of traffic.
§ Mr. PowellIn looking at the schemes to which these Questions refer, would the hon. Gentleman bear in mind that competition between ports for traffic can be, as the Rochdale Committee pointed out, not only a safeguard to the consumer but an important stimulus to efficiency?
§ Mr. SwinglerAs I have said, we are in favour of a better distribution of traffic between ports and, therefore, in considering transport requirements, we are doing all we can to improve access to these ports.
§ Mr. H. HyndHave these roads been in existence in the last 13 years?
§ Mr. FellWould the hon. Gentleman hold an inquiry—we could do with a few more—into the questions raised by my hon. Friend the Member for Bury St. Edmunds (Mr. Eldon Griffiths)?
§ Mr. SwinglerNo, Sir. We are getting on with the job of improving the roads.
§ 6. Mr. Norwoodasked the Minister of Transport what plans he has for the construction of a central England highway connecting the Midlands with the ports of King's Lynn and Yarmouth.
§ Mr. SwinglerOur plan is to improve the existing trunk route as necessary, and as the many other demands upon the road programme will permit.
§ Mr. NorwoodWould my hon. Friend bear in mind that although earlier today the claims of the more southern routes have been stressed, if a road of this kind is contemplated it would be better to build it on the north route to Lynn because this would help not only Norfolk but Suffolk?
§ Mr. SwinglerI should not like my hon. Friend to think that there was any particular proposal for the southern route. There are as many as 10 improvement schemes in hand or programmed on the A.47.
§ Mr. Eldon GriffithsWill the hon. Gentleman bear in mind that a policy which is based on the existing traffic will not help anyone and that his task as Minister is to contemplate the future and to recognise the growth which is taking place in the Eastern Counties? It is simply not good enough to fob us off with stories about what the existing traffic is.
§ Mr. SwinglerOur problem is that we have to deal with the existing inheritance and improve upon it.
§ Mr. Scott-HopkinsWhile bearing in mind the claims of the Eastern Counties and the North-East, will the hon. Gentleman also bear in mind that other parts of England need the expenditure of money which has already been authorised.
§ Mr. SpeakerThere may be perils if each of these quasi-local questions becomes an excuse for travelling round the map.