§ 30. Brigadier Clarkeasked the Secretary of State for Defence what was the cost of providing a military guard at Chequers for the week ending the 21st November.
§ Mr. MulleyThe only extra expense incurred in employing Royal Military Police at Chequers was their movement from their normal stations, which amounted to £40 10s. 0d.
§ Brigadier ClarkeDoes the right hon. Gentleman realise that many people considered this a very unnecessary guard to look after a handful of Ministers? At that time—I repeat, at that time—no one wanted to shoot them. Today, of course, it is different.
§ Mr. MulleyI am quite satisfied that the military police even today would be able to provide adequate security. While I know that the hon. and gallant Gentleman has not very much time for Her Majesty's Ministers, he should perhaps have some regard for the safety of the Chiefs of Staff, who were also at Chequers.
§ Mr. SolomonsArising from this exercise, would my right hon. Friend be prepared to work out the cost of the grooms and batmen who dance attendance upon the wives of senior officers at the Harrow and Eton cricket match?
§ Mr. SpeakerOrder. That is intriguing, but it does not arise from this Question.
§ Mr. Biggs-DavisonWas not the purpose of this extraordinary guard to protect Ministers from a possible putsch by the Young Socialists?
§ Mr. MulleyI think that the hon. Gentleman could do better than that if he really tried.