HC Deb 17 November 1964 vol 702 cc195-7
Q6. Mr. Maxwell

asked the Prime Minister what functions the Department of Technology has taken over from the Ministry of Education and Science, the Lord President of the Council, the Board of Trade, the Treasury and the Ministry of Aviation, respectively; and whether he will make a statement.

The Prime Minister

I cannot as yet go beyond the information already given to the House by my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Education and Science on 5th November. I hope that a further statement will be made shortly.

Mr. Maxwell

Does the Prime Minister realise that this is causing a great deal of uncertainty and dissatisfaction to research workers in universities, industry and Government Departments and that I hope that a speedy statement will be made?

The Prime Minister

No, Sir, I am not so aware, but a lot of work is going on on this question which, it will be realised, has been the subject of considerable thought and argument and disagreement over the past two or three years. But only three weeks ago we were being told that some of the workers in these industries thought that decisions were being taken too quickly. We are trying to establish a happy medium between moving too quickly and moving too slowly.

Mr. Deputy-Speaker

Sir Knox Cunningham—

Mr. Hogg

Could the right hon. Gentleman tell us when we shall see—

Mr. Deputy-Speaker

Order. It would assist the Chair in carrying out a difficult job if Front Benchers, like back benchers, did not speak until they were called. Sir Knox Cunningham.

Sir Knox Cunningham

Can the Prime Minister say whether the new Minister of Technology will deal with the new process of automation in shaving?

The Prime Minister

I should be glad to answer the question, but I did not hear the last two words of what the hon. Gentleman said.

Sir Knox Cunningham

I asked the right hon. Gentleman if he could say whether the new Minister of Technology would deal with the new process of automation in shaving?

Mr. Hogg

Can the Prime Minister tell us when the Minister of Technology will be with us in the House?

The Prime Minister

I should think that the period of delay will be rather comparable to that which we all suffered so greatly a year ago when we were waiting for the right hon. and learned Gentleman.

Mr. Hogg

Will the right hon. Gentleman recall the somewhat offensive observations then made from the Opposition benches about the arrangements, and will he accept my assurance that they will not be repeated on this occasion?