§ 22. Mr. Brockwayasked the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs what communication has been received from the Government of the Republic of South Africa regarding the restriction of air flights from the High Commission Territories across South African territory.
§ Mr. P. ThomasNone, Sir.
§ Mr. BrockwayAre we to understand that South Africa has unilaterally reached a decision on this matter which affects the flight of our planes over the territory of the Republic? Is it not particularly desirable that there should be some protection for the refugees who are seeking to travel from Basutoland to Bechuanaland or from one territory to another?
§ Mr. ThomasYes, Sir. It is quite right that the South African Government have unilaterally reached a decision on this matter. They are acting within their rights under the Chicago Convention in doing so.
§ Mr. MayhewWhile they have the right in international law, is it not a fact that they have taken the decision without consultation and it affects our sovereign rights within the Protectorates? What protest has the hon. Gentleman made and what consultations has he had to get this stopped?
§ Mr. ThomasAs I have said, they are within their rights under the Convention in requiring aircraft flying over their territory to land. That is what it amounts to. We are observing how these landing requirements work out in practice. If they appear injurious to the High Commission Territories we shall consider what action we can properly take.
§ Mr. Biggs-DavisonWill Her Majesty's Government do their best to see that this rather petty business of African 5 States and Territories restricting each other's flights is brought to an end as not conducive to peaceful conditions in Africa?
§ Mr. ThomasAgain, these decisions are matters for the African Governments themselves. I agree with my hon. Friend that it is certainly better for all concerned if we have free transit between countries.