§ Q3. Sir J. Langford-Holtasked the Prime Minister what decision has been taken with regard to the regulations governing the wearing by Her Majesty's subjects of decorations awarded to them by foreign States.
§ The Prime MinisterI do not propose to suggest to my noble Friend the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs that he should recommend that any change should be made in the Regulations.
§ Sir J. Langford-HoltMay I first declare that I have no interest in the matter? Will my right hon. Friend bear in mind that there is a strong feeling that while it is understandable that permission to accept such honours may be withheld, having given permission it is illogical to say that they may not be worn?
§ The Prime MinisterSince my hon. Friend raised this I have looked into the question, and I find it to be rather more complex than I think he realises. I feel that any changes would be likely to give rise to more difficulties, and therefore I think that it would be better to stick to the present regulations.
§ Mr. EdelmanHas not the Prime Minister an interest in the matter? Is not he the bearer of the Tunisian Order of Chastity, Fourth Class? May I ask whether the right hon. Gentleman intends to polish it up before the next General Election?
§ The Prime MinisterI regret to inform the House that although this Order was offered to me by the Bey of Tunis after the Battle of Tunis I was not permitted to accept it. Only generals and admirals were able to do so.
§ Sir H. Legge-BourkeCan my right hon. Friend give an assurance that there is no truth in the rumour that the Chancellor of the Exchequer is to be awarded the Order of the Golden Fleece after the Budget?
§ Mr. WoodburnIs the Prime Minister aware that if he is not "chased" now we hope he will be at the election?