HC Deb 07 February 1963 vol 671 cc642-3
6. Mr. G. Thomas

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department whether he will advise the appointment of a Royal Commission to inquire into the social consequences of the Betting and Gaming Act, 1960 and the Licensing Act, 1961.

Mr. Brooke

No, Sir.

Mr. Thomas

Am I to understand from that reply that the Minister is satisfied with the consequences of the Betting and Gaming Act, 1960? Does not he share the growing concern about the fantastic growth of casinos in our cities and the widespread increase in almost every other form of gambling? Is he aware of its effect on our home life and on the industrial activity of a great many people? Will he at least set up a Departmental committee to advise him upon the effects of the present widespread gambling increase?

Mr. Brooke

I am never satisfied, but I do not need a Departmental committee to advise me about these matters. It is my business to inform myself fully on them. I put it to the hon. Member that both the Betting and Gaming Act and the Licensing Act have been in force for a comparatively short time. It would be wise for Parliament to take a rather longer view before deciding to amend either of them.

Sir J. Duncan

Does my right hon. Friend realise that those who showed much interest in the Betting and Gaming Bill when it was going through Parliament are not satisfied with the results? I agree that the time has not yet arrived for a thorough-going review, but will my right hon. Friend watch the position very carefully?

Mr. Brooke

Yes. I can give my hon. Friend that assurance. These are extremely important matters.

Mr. Fletcher

That answer is not good enough. Is the Minister aware that there is growing concern about the undue amount of money being spent on betting and gaming? Bearing in mind the fact that when this Act was passed it was never contemplated that the present large number of betting shops would come into existence all over the country, will the right hon. Gentleman consider it his duty to look into the question now?

Mr. Brooke

It is too early to talk in terms of amendment. In fact, the number of betting offices is no greater than was foreseen when the Bill was passed. Furthermore, illegal street betting has virtually ceased. I agree with the hon. Member that social and economic questions are involved.

Mr. Thomas

In view of the unsatisfactory nature of the reply, I beg to give notice that I propose to raise the matter on the Adjournment at the earliest possible moment.