§ 46. Mr. Prenticeasked the Minister of Labour what was the reason for the rise in industrial accidents during 1961; what steps are being taken by his Department to deal with this situation; and if he will make a statement.
§ Mr. HareIn 1961 reported accidents increased by 2,251 or about 1 per cent. as compared with 1960. The figures so far available show that the rise can be entirely attributed to a further increase in accidents in the construction industry. This industry is now making special efforts to cut down the number of accidents. The complete picture of what 929 has happened can be obtained only after a careful study of accident rates which are now being calculated and which will be published in the Annual Report of the Chief Inspector of Factories in September. It is, however, clear that as in previous years most accidents were caused by human failings and carelessness. The most important contribution which can be made to accident prevention is better safety organisation throughout industry. As the hon. Member knows, I have taken up with a number of industries, including the construction industry, the need for a review of their arrangements and I propose to press on with this campaign.
§ Mr. PrenticeIs the Minister aware that I am sure that we all wish him well in the talks which he is having on these matters and we appreciate what he says about the human factor? Would he not agree, however, that it is a terribly serious situation that in the third year running the number of industrial casualties has gone up? Would not the right hon. Gentleman consider what has been constantly urged upon him by this side of the House and take one important step by making a drastic increase in the Factory Inspectorate so that there can be a much more frequent rate of inspections in dangerous industries?
§ Mr. HareAs the hon. Member knows, I have increased the number of inspectors. I know that he and every hon. Member share our concern about this appalling rate of accidents which industry and everybody connected with it must go flat out to try and correct.
Mr. LeeIs the right hon. Gentleman aware that if he takes the best firms where there is a really efficient organisation of this type the accident rate is far and away below the average? Would the right hon. Gentleman advertise the methods used in very good firms so that the bad firms can take advantage of them?
§ Mr. HareThe hon. Gentleman is perfectly right. I am trying to make available to those industries with less good records information about what can be done by those industries which are taking the matter seriously.