§ 11. Mr. W. R. Williamsasked the Postmaster-General, in view of the fact that the matter has been under consideration by his Department for over three years, if he has yet reached a decision on the introduction of a Giro system in the Post Office.
§ Mr. BevinsThe Government are not at present convinced of the long-term need for a Post Office Giro system. We shall, however, continue to examine the scope for such a scheme in the light of public needs.
§ Mr. WilliamsFirst, what difficulties are the Government experiencing in this matter? This system seems to be working satisfactorily in other countries. What are the right hon. Gentleman's disabilities? Secondly, is he aware that many of us are getting a little anxious lest the delay in reaching a decision is connected with the activities of banks and trustee savings banks, which are very keen that a system of this sort should be introduced?
§ Mr. BevinsI am, of course, well aware of the experience of the Giro system on the Continent. Not all the systems are successful by any means. At least two or three of them involve the taxpayers and governments concerned in quite substantial losses. I should like to make it clear that my reply to the hon. Gentleman does not rule out the possibility of a Giro system in this country. However, many developments are taking place over a very wide field, and these have to be considered very carefully.
§ Mr. WilliamsWill the right hon. Gentleman reply to the second point which I raised, which is very important? Is the delay due to the influence of the banking interests on the Postmaster-General?
§ Mr. BevinsNo, Sir. The delay is due to the enormous complications in the consideration of the whole problem.
§ Mr. JayCan the right hon. Gentleman say whether it is not himself but the Chancellor of the Exchequer who is obstructing progress in this matter?
§ Mr. BevinsProgress is not being obstructed by any member of Her Majesty's Government. It is simply that the question is so wide and complicated that it takes a long time to resolve.