§ 29. Sir C. Osborneasked the Minister of Transport why the Leicestershire portion of the London to Yorkshire motorway is to be built in two separate operations since it would be cheaper to finish the job at once when both men and machines have been assembled; what will be the estimated cost; if it will be on a cost-plus basis; and if he will make a statement.
§ Mr. HayAlthough the extension of M.1 is not one of the five major projects, we are proceeding as quickly as preparation and funds allow. By undertaking the work in stages, we can start earlier than would otherwise have been the case. Each stage will give progressive benefits.
Competitive tenders are now being invited for the first 26 miles. I would not wish to prejudice the outcome by quot 526 ing my own estimates of cost at this stage. It will not be on a cost-plus basis.
§ Sir C. OsborneIs it not true that the contractors on the first part of the M.1 stated that in their experience it would be better and cheaper to finish the job in one piece rather than in small parts? Is there any reason not to believe their opinion on that matter?
§ Mr. HayNo, Sir. The main length of the first section of the M.1, covering 55 miles, was divided into four contracts. As it happened, one firm was the successful tenderer for all four contracts. But it does not necessarily follow that there has to be one contract to get the maximum speed and the maximum efficiency.
§ Sir C. OsborneBut when that operation was finished, if I remember rightly, the contractors said that from their experience it would be cheaper to use the men and the machinery then assembled to go on with the job. Is there any reason to disbelieve that estimate?