HC Deb 17 July 1961 vol 644 cc876-7
34. Mr. Rankin

asked the Minister of Aviation what steps he is taking to put into effect the policy of Her Majesty's Government with regard to the assistance to be given to the nationalised air corporations to compensate them for expenditure incurred in initiating air routes which are now available to private air companies.

Mr. Rippon

There is no such policy.

Mr. Rankin

Is the hon. Gentleman telling us, despite recent happenings in this House, that the Government do not engage in such a policy where industries require it? Is not he aware that B.O.A.C., having built up these routes, is to be robbed of them with the connivance of the Government? Does not it seem fair and decent, in these circumstances, that the Corporation should have some compensation for the losses which the Government are forcing on it?

Mr. Rippon

Where the hon. Member is not expressing somewhat muddled views, he is prejudging the issues.

Mr. Strachey

Does not the hon. Gentleman agree that the most alarming feature of the recent decision by the Board on this matter is that private airlines are, as a previous Minister of Aviation put it, to be allowed to reap where they have not sown and to take advantage of the pioneer work that the Corporation has done on the public's behalf? It is that which has disturbed many people.

Mr. Rippon

All these applications now before the Board are sub judice. Its decisions may be the subject of an appeal to my right hon. Friend. In one case, an appeal has already been lodged. It would not be proper for me to comment on the merits of any of these matters.

Mr. Chetwynd

If the hon. Gentleman cannot comment, will he at least release the Corporation from the obligation of having to run uneconomic services?

Mr. Rippon

That is another question.

Mr. Rankin

Does not the hon. Gentleman realise the difficulties that this decision will force B.O.A.C. into? Is he saying that he is giving no thought to the problems that he will have to face because of it?

Mr. Rippon

I give a lot of thought to problems, but I do not prejudge matters which are sub judice.