HC Deb 12 December 1961 vol 651 cc191-3
10. Mrs. Butler

asked the Minister of Housing and Local Government and Minister for Welsh Affairs how many planning applications for office development in the London region he has called in in the past five years because he was not satisfied they complied with planning policy in the area.

Dr. Hill

Forty-three.

Mrs. Butler

Since the withholding of planning consent is the only effective means of controlling office development in south-east England, would the Minister indicate how far he has informed the planning authorities in the area that he will uphold their decisions if they refuse consent to office applications which might attract workers to already overcrowded areas of overfull employment, and that he will call in, if necessary, any applications of that nature for his personal consideration?

Dr. Hill

The hon. Lady will, I think, appreciate that one cannot, and must not, announce in advance the decision which one will reach on all such applications before the details are available. In general, I regard this as a problem that needs to be solved and I am doing my utmost, in the first instance through the amendments proposed for the London Development Plan, to apply pressure to reduce the growing amount of office accommodation in London.

26. Mr. Jay

asked the Minister of Housing and Local Government and Minister for Welsh Affairs what measures the Government propose to take restrain office development in Greater London and South-East England.

Dr. Hill

The problems resulting from office development arise mainly in the central area of London. It is the policy of the Government and of the local planning authorities concerned to limit expansion there by restricting both the areas zoned for offices and the size of office buildings, and by rigid control over changes to office use from other uses, particularly from residential use.

The proposals for the amendment of the Greater London Plan at present before me contain proposals which I am examining for the further tightening of control over office accommodation in the central area. I am also considering the question whether anything more can in practice be done.

Mr. Jay

Can the Minister give any details of how this policy will be carried out and how he proposes to tighten this control? In particular, is he aware that one of the many obstacles to any progress at the moment is the enormous financial compensation which local authorities have to pay if they refuse the necessary permission?

Dr. Hill

In answer to the first part of the supplementary question, I would say, without going into details, for they are a matter for consultation with London County Council, that the suggestions include cutting down the office zones, and the requirement of replacement of any residential accommodation on redevelopment. In answer to the second point, I realise the difficulties caused by the Third Schedule of the 1947 Act, under which there is to be compensation if a 10 per cent. increase is not allowed on reconstruction. Unfortunately, that 10 per cent. is interpreted in cubic space rather than in floor space.

Mr. Gower

Will my right hon. Friend take account of the fact that although office building uses only about 6 per cent. of the building force, that activity is concentrated in a few areas, including London and the Midlands, and to that extent is a serious problem?

Dr. Hill

I recognise that and I look at this mainly as a London problem, but I also recognise that there is a good case for replacing some of this out-of-date office accommodation.

Mr. Jay

Even though the 1947 Act was passed by a Labour Government, may I ask the right hon. Gentleman whether he will not look at the possibility of amending it, particularly with regard to the 10 per cent.?

Dr. Hill

Without particularly making any point about that, I am looking at this question.