HC Deb 05 July 1960 vol 626 cc196-7
4. Mr. Boyden

asked the Minister of Works why he has not accepted the recommendation of the Ancient Monuments Board for England that every scheduled monument should exhibit a public notice board describing its historical significance.

Lord John Hope

All ancient monuments which come within my full control are named. Some have a description of their historical significance. To extend this to all scheduled monuments, which number 7,000 and which often comprise only indentations and undulations in the ground, for example, a barrow, despite their importance would not in my view justify the expenditure of £70,000 which is the amount which would be involved.

Mr. Boyden

Is the Minister aware that the committee which advises him on these matters has been advising him since 1957 that it is very necessary to safeguard these monuments and that continuous destruction is going on for lack of action? Further, is he aware that the exaggerated language which he charged me with using on a previous occasion was the language of his own advisory committee?

Lord John Hope

There is all the difference in the world between protecting an ancient monument of a certain sort and putting a sign on it. We do our best always to see that they are protected, but it is not always easy.

Mr. Fletcher

Is the Minister saying that he would like to do this if the Chancellor agrees?

Lord John Hope

No, Sir. If the hon. Gentleman is asking for my opinion, as I think he is, it is that I do not think that this expenditure would be justified.