§ 6. Mr. Shinwellasked the Minister of Power what consultative machinery exists between his Department and the National Coal Board in respect of the closure of a pit or pits.
§ Mr. WoodColliery closures are entirely a matter for the National Coal Board. The Board keeps me informed about the total size of its programme and, as soon as it decides which individual pits are to be closed, the information is passed on to the Board of Trade and Ministry of Labour.
§ Mr. ShinwellIn view of the social consequences of the closure of pits, or even of one single pit, why should not the Minister be consulted so that he can take account of these consequences and advise the Board whether it is desirable to proceed with closure? Why should not hon. Members in this assembly be informed of what is going on even in their own constituencies?
§ Mr. WoodI think that the right hon. Gentleman, with his experience, will be well aware of the reasons why full information cannot be given in too great detail in advance. But to put his fears at rest, I am of course in constant communication with the Board. I discussed this matter well ahead, but the important point is that this is a decision of the Board. I am informed in good time so that arrangements can be made for alternative employment.
§ Mr. ShinwellThis is very important indeed. Suppose in a particular area, say in my constituency, the Board contemplates closing a pit or pits. What am I to do to protect my constituents? If I go to the Minister he says "I have, got nothing to do with it, go to the Board". If I go to the Board, it tells me to mind my own business. What is one to do?
§ Mr. WoodOne important case in point is the pit at West Wylam. As the right hon. Gentleman knows, the Board of Trade has scheduled the area as a development area to take account of the possible unemployment that will arise from that closure.