§ Mr. RentonI beg to move, in page 3, line 8, to leave out subsection (4).
This is a subsection included by the Lords for the purely technical reason for avoiding questions of privilege, and in accordance to the custom, I beg to move that it now be left out.
§ Amendment agreed to.
§ Motion made, and Question proposed, That the Clause, as amended, stand part of the Bill.
§ 3.45 p.m.
§ Mr. LiptonI wish to ask the Parliamentary Secretary a question. This is a definition Clause, and the only person defined in it is the Receiver. My hon. Friend the Member for Widnes (Mr. MacColl) put a point earlier, and I am wondering whether there should not be in the Clause some definition of what is 1647 a magistrates' court. It may be a matter of some importance, and I would like the Parliamentary Secretary to say whether he is satisfied—
§ The Deputy-ChairmanI think that the hon. Member is asking for a definition to be put into the Clause. That does not arise on the Question "That the Clause, as amended, stand part of the Bill."
§ Mr. LiptonMay I put this point to the Parliamentary Secretary, Sir Gordon? Is he satisfied that the Clause as it stands will not involve us in some difficulties at a later date by reason of the fact that there is no definition of what constitutes a magistrates' court? I put that point to the hon. and learned Gentleman because certain remarks were made by my hon. Friend the Member for Widnes.
§ Mr. RentonThere is no difficulty if the previous legislation mentioned in subsection (3) is referred to.
§ Question put and agreed to.
§ Clause, as amended, ordered to stand part of the Bill.
§ Schedule agreed to.
§ Bill reported, with Amendments; as amended, considered; read the Third time and passed, with Amendments.