HC Deb 21 January 1959 vol 598 c174
10. Mr. Willis

asked the Postmaster-General what representations he received asking that the address Portobello, Midlothian, be changed; and what evidence he has received expressing satisfaction with the proposed new address.

Mr. K. Thompson

Ever since Portobello became part of the city of Edinburgh in 1896, there have been periodic requests for the name of the city to be included in its address. I have received letters welcoming the change, which has also been supported by letters in the Press: both the city corporation and the local post office advisory committee approve the change.

Mr. Willis

Is the hon. Gentleman aware that, in spite of what he says, there is very strong opposition to the loss of this historic name? Very few people think that it will add to the efficiency of the service, and the vast majority think that this is just another case of unnecessary Bumbledom.

Mr. Thompson

I have no reason whatever for thinking that that is a widely held opinion, and certainly it would be untrue if it were held in that form. There is no reason at all why the name Portobello should disappear. We would, in fact, rather welcome it if it appeared together with the district number of Edinburgh on the correspondence. There will be, in fact, an increase in efficiency and a saving in cost as a result.