§ 32. Mr. Frank Allaunasked the Chancellor of the Exchequer how much the Iron and Steel Holdings Realisation Agency authorised Richard Thomas and Baldwin's Limited to contribute to a publication issued by the British Iron and Steel Federation in October, 1958, attacking steel nationalisation; and whether he will give instructions that public money should not be spent on subsidising propaganda against public ownership.
§ 52. Mr. Marquandasked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what steps are taken by the Iron and Steel Holding and Realisation Agency to ensure that no contributions are made, directly or indirectly, by iron and steel companies, the shares of which are held by the Agency, towards advertising or other forms of a political campaign against national ownership of the industry.
§ Mr. ErrollIt is a standing instruction from the Agency to the companies they hold that no contribution should be made to any political organisation. Richard Thomas and Baldwin's, in common with other steel producers, makes a contribution to the administrative expenses of the British Iron and Steel Federation. No question arose of making any special contribution to the publication to which the hon. Member presumably refers.
§ Mr. AllaunBut is it not a fact that Richard Thomas, which is still publicly owned, have contributed towards recent Steel Federation advertisements in the newspapers, in addition to the pamphlet I have mentioned, attacking public ownership and costing thousands of pounds? Is it not grossly unfair and inequitable that the Government should be using taxpayers' money to subsidise what is virtually Conservative Party policy?
§ Mr. ErrollAs I said, no question of any special provision arose, and I should like to stress that the Agency keeps the question of subscriptions under continual review.
§ Mr. MarquandWill the hon. Gentleman give an undertaking that the Government also will keep it strictly under review and ensure that no contributions, directly or indirectly, are 559 made on a political matter like this by companies which are still the property of the nation and the people?
§ Mr. ErrollMy right hon. Friend has every confidence in the Agency carrying out its periodical review.
§ Mr. J. GriffithsWill the hon. Gentleman state that the Government deprecate any public body of this kind using public money for party political purposes?
§ Mr. K. RobinsonAnswer yes or no.
§ Mr. ErrollI think that is a hypothetical question.
Mr. H. WilsonIn view of the earlier Questions, will the hon. Gentleman say whether in paying money to the Iron and Steel Federation, Richard Thomas and Baldwin have a right to opt out of paying that part of the money which is devoted to political purposes, as every trade unionist in this country has?
§ Mr. ErrollMy right hon. Friend has no responsibility for the affairs of the British Iron and Steel Federation.
§ Mr. MarquandIn view of the unsatisfactory nature of the reply to my Question No. 52, I give notice that I will raise this matter on the Adjournment.