§ 43. Mr. S. O. Daviesasked the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs how much British arms and military equipment has been supplied by Her Majesty's 198 Government to the Government of Lebanon; and why.
§ Mr. Ormsby-GoreIt is not the policy of Her Majesty's Government to reveal details of arms transactions with other Governments. The reasons for this were explained by my right hon. Friend the Lord Privy Seal in reply to a Question on 4th December, 1956.
§ Mr. DaviesHas not the right hon. Gentleman admitted this afternoon that arms are being supplied to this discredited Government of the Lebanon? Are not the Government aware that all such interference in the past has failed?
§ Mr. Ormsby-GoreHer Majesty's Government have for some time been a normal supplier of the Lebanese armed forces, and it would be an interference in the affairs of Lebanon to refuse to honour particular orders for arms which have been placed by the recognised Government of the Lebanese State.
§ Mr. LiptonHas not the Minister seen the report in today's newspapers that one of the arrangements made between the Prime Minister and President Eisenhower in Washington is for the Lebanese Government to be supplied with twelve Hawker Hunter jet fighters?
§ Mr. Ormsby-GoreI have not seen the report, but I do not see why the authorised Government of any country should not place orders for arms.
§ Mr. S. SilvermanWould the Minister bear in mind, first, that this principle has not always been honoured—particularly in the most tragic case of Spain, during the civil war—and, secondly, that to follow the principle of supplying arms of this character without conditions and control to any Middle Eastern Government that happens to be able to maintain itself in power and buy them would merely be to add enormously to the danger in what is already the most explosive area in the world?
§ Mr. Ormsby-GoreI would say that the recent supply of arms to the Lebanese has been on a very small scale.