§ 16. Miss Burtonasked the President of the Board of Trade whether he is aware of the concern of manufacturers and consumers at the fact that anyone may issue a certificate of quality for goods, which certificates are frequently based on trivial standards; and if he will be prepared to introduce legislation on the matter.
§ Sir D. EcclesI am not aware of any widespread concern. A critical approach by purchasers to these certificates would be more effective than legislation.
§ Miss BurtonIs the President aware that he is fortunate in not having to purchase these goods? Furthermore, what does he propose should be done to merchants who sell goods stating that they have been tested by XYZ—and using that fact as a selling recommendation—when in reality they have been tested and failed by XYZ? Does he propose that there should be no redress?
§ Sir D. EcclesI am told that it is exceedingly difficult to take legislative action in this matter. We have no powers at present. By and large, it is a question of judgment as to quality. A man may say, "My beer is best," but it cannot very easily be proved.
§ Miss BurtonIs the Minister aware that he is on the wrong tack? How can a person tell that the goods have been failed by XYZ unless the label says so? No merchant in his right senses is likely to say so.
§ Sir D. EcclesThe publicity which the hon. Lady gives to these matters is doing good, but this is not a case where we can proceed by compulsion.
§ Miss BurtonOn a point of order. In view of the unsatisfactory nature of the reply—and if it is possible to get round the question of legislation—I beg to give notice that I shall raise the matter on the Adjournment.