§ 31. Mr. Willeyasked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what representations he received prior to 5th November about the repeal of the disciplinary provisions of the Agriculture Act, 1947.
Mr. AmoryI have had representations of many kinds, some in support of the existing provisions, others favouring substantial amendment and others again urging total repeal.
§ Mr. WilleyWhile thanking the right hon. Gentleman for his evasive reply, may I ask whether he will deny that no responsible body in this country has asked for the removal of these disciplinary powers? In view of the dissatisfaction that the right hon. Gentleman's proposed action is causing, would he give an assurance that he will reconsider his decision?
Mr. AmoryI am aware that the three farming bodies told me that they would prefer the retention of these powers, but it is my colleague the Secretary of State for Scotland and I who have to bear ultimate responsibility for the fair administration of these powers.
§ Mr. WilleyIs the right hon. Gentleman conceding that he is overriding every responsible opinion in the farming industry?
Mr. AmoryMost certainly not. I also claim that any fear that Part I is going to be undermined is entirely groundless. The passing of the Agriculture Act, 1957, has in fact very greatly strengthened and made more effective Part I of the Agriculture Act, 1947.
§ Mr. WilleyCan the right hon. Gentleman say what responsible body in the farming industry has asked for the repeal of these powers?
Mr. AmoryIt is the Government's responsibility ultimately. They carry the responsibility, and it is we who have to use our best judgment, as we are responsible for the administration of these powers.
§ Mr. WoodburnIs the right hon. Gentleman aware that the farmers have been thrown into confusion by the statements which have been made about the Government's future action? Is there any truth in the suggestion that they had consultations with the Country Landowners' Association who supported them in this action, and that the Government are taking this action in favour of the landowners rather than in favour of the farmers?
Mr. AmoryNo, Sir. The Country Landowners' Association was one of the bodies to which I referred and which said that, on balance, it would prefer the retention of these powers.