§ 10. Mr. Sorensenasked the Minister of Works to what extent railings or fences removed by the decision of a predecessor in his office from certain London parks and open spaces under the supervision of his Department have since been replaced; and why this action has been taken.
§ Mr. MolsonThe boundary railings and fences of the central London parks were for the most part removed during the war as part of the national effort to obtain iron scrap. These have been replaced by chain link fencing, hedges, or posts and rails: in some cases in order to enable the parks to be closed at night, in others in order to mark the boundaries.
§ Mr. SorensenIs the Minister aware that a number of railings were removed as far back as the time of Mr. George Lansbury and that some of the fences which Mr. Lansbury had cause to remove have apparently been replaced? Will not the right hon. Gentleman follow in Mr. Lansbury's steps, at least in this respect, and try to remove as many fences as possible or prevent fences being restored?
§ Mr. MolsonThe rules providing for the closing of certain of the Royal Parks 1042 are extremely anomalous. Rules that apply in one place do not apply elsewhere and I intend to look at this matter. It is necessary for me to await the Report of the Departmental Committee on Homosexuality and Prostitution, which is quite likely to have a bearing on this.
§ Mr. G. JegerDoes the right hon. Gentleman recall that a few months ago he promised to consider the Coalbrook-dale gates in Hyde Park? Has he done anything about them?
§ Mr. MolsonYes. Sir, I have, and I shall be writing to the hon. Member shortly.