HC Deb 31 January 1957 vol 563 cc1168-9
51. Mr. Hector Hughes

asked the Prime Minister if he is aware that Standing Orders Numbers 1 and 2 which relate to Private Members' Bills have been used in such a way as to convert certain Private Members' Bills which the House unanimously has given leave to bring in under the Ten Minutes Rule from unopposed into opposed business; that this conversion frustrates the progress and passage of Private Members' Bills; and if he will move to refer this problem to the Select Committee on Procedure now sitting for consideration and solution.

The Prime Minister

Whether or not business is opposed or unopposed must depend upon the attitude of hon. Members at each stage of its progress and I know of no reason why the fact that hon. Members allow a private Member to introduce a Bill unopposed should commit them not to oppose it when it has been published.

I do not see any reason to refer this matter to the Select Committee on Procedure.

Mr. Hughes

Does not the Prime Minister realise that here is a real wrong which requires to be remedied? Is he aware that by simply saying "I object" any hon. Member who knows nothing of the contents of a Bill, can in that way frustrate a Private Member's Bill which may be, and very often is, a valuable contribution to legislation? Will the Prime Minister look at this matter seriously and not jestingly?

The Prime Minister

The facts are that under the Standing Orders no opposed business, except proceedings exempted in a special way, can be taken after 10 p.m. on ordinary days or 4 p.m. on Fridays. I appreciate the argument of the hon. and learned Gentleman. He says that if leave to introduce has been given under the Ten Minutes Rule, that should preclude any objection at a later stage, but I should have thought not. When a Bill is introduced under the Ten Minutes Rule it is not even published, and I do not think it unreasonable to say that the ordinary rights should apply to such a Bill as to other business which comes at the end of the day's work.