HC Deb 01 August 1957 vol 574 c1489
10. Mr. J. Johnson

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he is aware of the public anxiety in Rugby regarding the closure of the tax collection office; and whether he will reconsider his decision, bearing in mind the inconvenience caused to Rugbeians having to journey to Coventry or Leamington.

Mr. Powell

I understand that the town clerk has written to the Board of Inland Revenue, which has explained that the new arrangements will cause little inconvenience to residents of Rugby, but will make a substantial contribution to economy and efficiency.

Mr. Johnson

Is the hon. Gentleman aware that it is not the view of the town clerk, nor of the town council, nor of the chamber of commerce, nor of the big industrial firms working in the town? Is it not a fact that no employees will be sacked but will merely move offices? Is not this a matter of penny wise pound foolish?

Mr. Powell

I can assure the hon. Member that this closing, with others, will result in a net saving in staff and in expenditure. There is widespread confusion in Rugby and elsewhere about the functions of collectors' offices and inspector's offices. It is with an inspectors' office that the public nearly always has to deal.

Mr. Johnson

Can the hon. Member say what other towns of comparable size and economic and industrial importance have suffered this fate?

Mr. Powell

Perhaps the hon. Member will study the list in my reply of 3rd June to my hon. Friend the Member for Lang-stone (Mr. Stevens).