§ 4. Mr. Callaghanasked the Chancellor of the Exchequer how much is spent annually on fundamental scientific research by the University Grants Committee; and the total sum allocated to it each year.
§ Mr. H. BrookeRecurrent grants made to universities on the recommendation of the University Grants Committee are block grants towards their maintenance as centres of advanced education and research. Part is spent on fundamental research, but grants are not normally earmarked for specific purposes, and research expenditure therefore is not separately distinguishable.
The provision for recurrent grant for the quinquennium 1952–57, as announced in February, 1952, rose from £20 million in 1952–53 to £25 million in 1956–57. Since that announcement, additional moneys have been provided for increases in academic salaries and for the expansion of technology.
§ Mr. CallaghanDoes not the Financial Secretary think that we really ought to know a little more about how much is spent upon fundamental scientific research in the universities? Is he aware that there is an estimate that the amount is about £5 million, and that there is a growing feeling that it is inadequate to our needs?
§ Mr. BrookeI am anxious not to embark upon a policy of Government earmarking of these sums. It is far better to leave the matter to the discretion of the universities. That is why I am not able to give a precise answer to the hon. Gentleman's Question.
§ Mr. CallaghanWould it not be worth the country's while if the Financial Secretary asked the universities how much is being spent upon this very important 410 matter? If he thought it was insufficient, would there not be a case for him to go to the Chancellor of the Exchequer and ask for an increase in the total amount?
§ Mr. BrookeAs the hon. Gentleman should be aware, the arrangements for the next quinquennium will be the right moment to decide what future grants should be.