HC Deb 18 July 1956 vol 556 cc1200-1
30. Mr. Ernest Davies

asked the Minister of Transport and Civil Aviation by how long it is estimated completion of the Cromwell Road Extension would be delayed if a fly-over were constructed at Hammersmith in place of the projected roundabout.

Mr. Watkinson

I am advised by the London County Council that if the fly-over were included in the present scheme the provision of a through route would be delayed by two or three years. The hon. Member no doubt appreciates that there is no question of a fly-over being an alternative to the projected roundabout. The complete scheme provides for a fly-over and a surface roundabout.

Mr. Davies

Since the Minister stated last week that in his view this fly-over will ultimately be necessary, is it not shortsighted to take the view that it is not necessary at the present time? Surely it will cost more when it is constructed later on, and more dislocation of traffic is likely to occur when the volume of traffic is so much greater? Cannot a new decision be taken?

Mr. Watkinson

The hon. Gentleman is making a very good point, but I have discussed this matter personally in great detail with the London County Council. The difficulties are that there is a great deal of property acquisition to be done before the fly-over can be built and that local opposition, which is very strong, is by no means overcome. I think I can best say that the scheme is going to be fitted for the fly-over, but not with it at the moment. I do not think that that will much increase the cost when it can be and is built.