HC Deb 16 February 1956 vol 548 cc2509-10
18. Lieut.-Colonel Bromley-Davenport

asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food whether fowl typhoid is a notifiable disease under his regulations.

Mr. Amory

Fowl typhoid is not a notifiable disease.

Lieut.-Colonel Bromley-Davenport

Why not?

Mr. Amory

One of the main reasons is that the symptoms are by no means easy to recognise. The other reasons are so technical that I could not give them now, but I will write to my hon. and gallant Friend if he would like me to do so.

Lieut.-Colonel Bromley-Davenport

But should not this highly infectious and lethal disease be notifiable? Cannot it be carried for miles and miles by wild birds? Is it not causing great harm to our livestock?

Mr. Amory

I should have no hesitation whatever in making it notifiable if I thought that it would achieve the end we all want, which is to eradicate the disease. I think I had better write to my hon. and gallant Friend about it.

Mr. Chetwynd

But he never gets his letters.

Back to
Forward to