HC Deb 06 February 1956 vol 548 cc1325-8
23 and 24. Mr. T. Brown

asked the Minister of Pensions and National Insurance (1) to state, in tabular form, the number of claims made, the number of claims allowed, and the number of claims disallowed for disablement benefits; the number of claims made for death benefits, the number of claims allowed, the number disallowed; the amount of money paid out to each case during the period from 10th March, 1952, up to and including 31st January, 1956, under the pneumoconiosis and byssinosis scheme, which became operative on 10th March, 1952; and the total amount of benefits paid out;

(2) the number of claims made, the number of claims allowed, the number of claims disallowed under the Pneumoconiosis and Byssinosis Scheme, 1954, which became operative on 8th November, 1954, up to and including 31st January, 1956.

Mr. Boyd-Carpenter

As the Answer is long and complicated, I will, with permission, circulate it in the OFFICIAL REPORT.

Mr. Brown

I was quite sure that that would be the Answer, but has the Minister or his Department been made aware of the disquiet and dissatisfaction now prevailing in the mining areas with regard to the actions of the silicosis boards? Does he know that many men who get a general practitioner's report, fortified by an X-ray photograph from the local hospital, to the effect that they are suspected to be suffering from silicosis or pneumoconiosis, are nevertheless turned down flat when they go before the silicosis boards and that that is causing grave discontent in the mining areas?

Mr. Boyd-Carpenter

I know that this is a matter of very great importance in the mining areas, and I will happily look into any particular case which the hon. Gentleman may be good enough to draw to my attention. On his general proposition, I shall certainly bear in mind what he has said, but he cannot expect me to agree to any general criticism of these boards, which try to do a good job to the best of their ability.

Following is the Answer:

PNEUMOCONIOSIS AND BYSSINOSIS BENEFIT SCHEME
(1) Number of claims analysed by result
Disablement claims
Up to 7th November, 1954, when the Scheme was extended to include cases of partial disablement, 11,361 claims to disablement allowances were made; as a result 3,808 awards had been made, 7,006 claims had been disallowed and 547 claims were outstanding on 7th November, 1954. The figures for each year were:
1952 (from 10th March) 1953 1954 (up to 7th November) Total
Claims received 5,586(a) 3,587 2,188 11,361(a)
Claims allowed 2,179(a) 1,148 481 3,808(a)
Claims disallowed 2,153 2,850 2,003 7,006
Claims outstanding at end of period 1,254 843 547 547
(a) Includes 803 existing beneficiaries taken over from the former benefit schemes.
Between 8th November, 1954, and 28th January, 1956, 10,795 claims were made on top of the 547 claims which were outstanding on 8th November, 1954. As a result of these 11,342 claims, 4,577 awards had been made for partial disablement and 507 for total disablement. 5,142 claims had been disallowed and 1,116 were outstanding on 28th January, 1956.
Death claims up to 28th January, 1956
—— 1952 (from 10th March) 1953 1954 1955 1956 (up to 28th January) Total
Claims received 860 582 587 718 84 2,831
Claims allowed 458 399 367 394 29 1,647
Claims disallowed 237 239 230 299 28 1,033
Claims outstanding at end of period 165 109 99 124 151 151
(2) Amounts paid to the latest available date
Class of case Period 10th March, 1952 to 31st March, 1952 Financial year 1952–53 Financial year 1953–54 Financial year 1954–55 (provisional) Period 10th March, 1952 to 31st March, 1955
£ £ £ £ £
Disablement allow ances 5,000 275,034 300,364 375,000 955,398
Death benefit 114,966 94,636 86,645 296,247
Total 5,000 390,000 395,000 461,645 1,251,645

25. Mr. B. Taylor

asked the Minister of Pensions and National Insurance if he will state the number of cases referred to the pneumoconiosis boards in 1954 not diagnosed as being disabled by pneumoconiosis but suffering from emphysema.

Mr. Boyd-Carpenter

These figures will take a little time to collect, but when this has been done I will write to the hon. Member. I should, however, warn him that as the object of these boards is the diagnosis of pneumoconiosis, the figures which I send will not cover all cases in which emphysema is present.

Forward to