§ 14. Lieut.-Colonel Liptonasked the Minister of Labour why it is necessary to have two official indices for measuring changes in retail prices.
§ Mr. WatkinsonI would refer the hon. and gallant Member to the reply given by my right hon. Friend the Chancellor of the Exchequer on 9th December, 1954, in answer to a Question by the right hon. Gentleman the Member for Leeds, South (Mr. Gaitskell).
§ Lieut.-Colonel LiptonIs the hon. Gentleman aware that these indices are contradictory, misleading and out-of-date 1103 and that the Government choose the more favourable one to calculate the falling value of the £? In those circumstances, should we not scrap both of them as quickly as possible and produce an index in which ordinary folk may have real confidence?
§ Mr. WatkinsonI do not think the hon. and gallant Member has had in mind the fact that the T.U.C. in its last Report said that the Interim Index of Retail Prices is a very accurate measure of the cost of living.