§ 22. Mr. Lewisasked the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs what information he has on the Soviet Government's policy regarding four-Power talks after the ratification of the Paris Agreements.
§ Mr. TurtonThe only information I have is derived from a number of recent public statements, in which the Soviet Government have expressed their views on the prospect of four-Power talks after ratification of the Paris Agreements.
§ Mr. LewisIf the Minister is referring to the broadcast on 15th January and to Mr. Molotov's statement of 8th February, as I assume he is, is it not the case that 2043 in both instances the Soviet Government stated that they would not agree to four-Power talks after ratification? If that is the case, can he explain why it was that the Prime Minister was not aware of that fact when I asked him a Question about it last week?
§ Mr. TurtonThat is not the case. I have here the broadcast statements to which the hon. Gentleman refers, and I do not find that they contain that. They did say that negotiations on German reunification would be in one case "pointless" and in the other "impossible." They used other phrases like that, but they have in no case said that they are unwilling to enter into negotiations.
§ Mr. S. SilvermanWould the hon. Member explain why he attaches such importance to the parts of the broadcast to which he has just referred when, on a previous Question about elections in Germany, he was of opinion that the broadcasts did not express the views of the Russian Government?
§ Mr. TurtonIn this Question I am asked what information I have from broadcasts, and I have tried to the best of my ability to inform the House about these different broadcast statements. In the previous Question the right hon. Member for Easington (Mr. Shinwell) asked me whether it was in one broadcast statement, and I made it clear, I hope, that more than one broadcast statement was involved.
§ Mr. BeswickWould the Under-Secretary be good enough to read Question No. 22 and explain the reference to broadcasts?
§ Mr. TurtonI was asked what information I had, and I have said in my reply that the information is contained in a number of broadcast statements. The supplementary question was directed to the content of the broadcast statements.
§ Mr. LewisThe Under-Secretary himself has quoted the fact that the Soviet Government have said that in the event of ratification it would be "pointless" and "impossible" to have four-Power talks. Can he now explain what that means, if it does not mean that they would not agree to talks?
§ Mr. AlportWould it be possible for Questions not to be arranged in succession to the same hon. Members, so that they are not in a position to abuse their rights?
§ Mr. SpeakerThat would not on the whole be convenient. It sometimes happens that an hon. Member who is called for his next Question uses the opportunity to ask an additional supplementary question. But I do not think that that calls for any alteration of the order of Questions on the Order Paper.
§ Mr. SpeakerThe hon. Member is entitled to make an explanation.
§ Mr. LewisThank you, Mr. Speaker. Can I explain to you that when I was called I thought that you were calling me to put another supplementary Question.
§ 23. Mr. Lewisasked the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs if he will approach the Soviet Government with proposals for the calling of a Four-Power conference, immediately on the ratification of the Paris Agreements, for the purpose of discussing international difficulties.
§ Mr. TurtonI have nothing to add to the reply given by my right hon. Friend the Foreign Secretary to the right hon. and learned Member for Rowley Regis and Tipton (Mr. A. Henderson), on 16th February.
§ Mr. LewisThat reply to my right hon. and learned Friend, as this reply, was completely unsatisfactory. Cannot the Under-Secretary hold out at least some hope? What harm, what danger, what difficulty can there be in making some proposals, or soundings, or some progress towards getting four-Power talks, in view of the gravity of the situation as witnessed by the Prime Minister's speech yesterday?
§ Mr. TurtonI hope that the hon. Member will take courage from the fact that the majority of democratic countries in Europe believe that the ratification of these agreements will facilitate four-Power talks.
§ Mr. ShinwellWill the hon. Member clear up this point? Will he make it quite 2045 clear that the Government are ready and willing to enter into four-Power talks immediately after ratification?
§ Mr. TurtonI am grateful for the opportunity. That has been made clear by my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs and by the Prime Minister on numerous occasions, and I reiterate it today.