HC Deb 13 July 1954 vol 530 c349
Mr. H. Macmillan

I beg to move, in page 7, line 23, to leave out from the first "was" to "to," and to insert: entitled in the same capacity both to the claim holding and. This is the first of a series of Amendments designed to prevent the confusion which would otherwise arise where one person was acting in more than one capacity. For instance, he might be an executor or a trustee. These Amendments make it clear that when the Bill speaks of the holder of the claim holding being entitled to the relevant interest in land, it means entitled in the same capacity, in the sense in which that term is defined in an Amendment which we hope to make to Clause 71 when we reach it.

Amendment agreed to.