§ 20. Mr. Simmonsasked the Minister of Pensions and National Insurance if he will introduce legislation to subject the Instruments altering rates of war pension to control by Parliament.
§ Mr. PeakeNo, Sir. I do not consider that there is any need to alter the present arrangements, which have worked very well over the past 30 years. As the hon. Member is aware, it is always possible for the House to discuss the subject of war pensions by arrangements made through the usual channels.
§ Mr. SimmonsIf the Minister is not prepared to alter the Instruments by which these increases and alterations are made, will he regard it as a point of honour that the House should be given an opportunity to discuss them, because hon. Members were precluded from doing so during the debate on the National Insurance Bill?
§ Mr. PeakeCertainly. I should not have the slightest objection to a discussion, but a proposal to embody in legislation any improvements in war pensions would have delayed a great many improvements in the war pensions code which we have otherwise been able to make.
§ 26. Mr. Simmonsasked the Minister of Pensions and National Insurance whether he will give an assurance that there will be no hardening of the conditions governing the award of pensions 2415 and allowances to war widows and war-disabled pensioners because of the increase in the monetary value of the pensions and allowances; and if he will give a further assurance that his Department will take special action on behalf of all badly-disabled men, especially the ageing veterans of the 1914–18 war, whose disabilities have worsened and now warrant an increased assessment.
§ Mr. PeakeAs regards the first part of the Question, I readily give the desired assurance. As regards the second part, as the hon. Member knows I am always happy to review sympathetically any case in which it is claimed that the war disablement has worsened.
§ Mr. SimmonsIs the Minister aware that this is a friendly Question, inspired by the fact that there is disturbance over the administrative changes in his Ministry whereby most regional officers, trained in the sympathetic appreciation of the problems of the disabled, have been superseded by National Insurance appointees, and that the position of the Deputy-Secretary for War Pensions has been abolished altogether? Will the right hon. Gentleman assure us that this does not mean a hardening of attitude?
§ Mr. PeakeI certainly give that assurance, and I go further and tell the hon. Gentleman that we are determined to ensure that the treatment of war pensioners shall be as sympathetic as ever it has been in the past.
§ 29. Lieut.-Colonel Liptonasked the Minister of Pensions and National Insurance from what date increased war pensions will be payable; and when they will be paid.
§ Mr. PeakeAs I announced on 1st December, the increased rates of war disability pensions will take effect from the beginning of February. I hope that all these increases will have been put into operation by about the end of March.
§ Lieut.-Colonel LiptonDoes that mean that these people will have to wait until the end of March before they get the increases that the Minister promised for the end of February? What is the advantage of having war pensions dealt with by Royal Warrant if they are subject to the same kind of delay as that experienced by all the other people who have to await legislation?
§ Mr. PeakeThey will not all have to wait until the end of March. Different categories of war pensioners—officers and other ranks, for example—come under different administrative arrangements. There is a very complex system of supplements and allowances, the increases in which have to be operated as well. However, we hope that by the end of March or earlier all war pensioners will get the increase to which they are entitled.