HC Deb 10 March 1953 vol 512 c1094
2. Mr. Hale

asked the President of the Board of Trade what matters are already referred to the Monopolies Commission; what was respectively their original date of reference; when reports are anticipated; and what other matters are to be referred.

Mr. P. Thorneycroft

I would refer the hon. Member to the answers given on 16th and 19th December to my hon. Friends the Members for Shrewsbury (Mr. Langford-Holt) and Sevenoaks (Mr. J. Rodgers). I hope shortly to receive the report on non-ferrous metal semi-manufactures and, later this year, the report on imported timber. I cannot yet say how long it will take to complete the other outstanding inquiries, or what other matters will be referred to the Commission.

Mr. Hale

Will the right hon. Gentleman bear in mind that the very excellent work which the Commission are doing is to some extent being frustrated by lack of staff? Secondly, will he tell us whether he has now completed his consideration of whether he should refer the question of the textile machinery industry to the Monopolies Commission.

Mr. Thorneycroft

I endorse the hon. Gentleman's well-deserved tribute to the work of the Commission, but I am afraid that, at the moment, I am not in a position to say what further reference I shall make. That does not mean that I am not giving anxious consideration to it.

Mr. Gaitskell

Has the right hon. Gentleman yet made up his mind about what changes should be made in the legislation under which the Monopolies Commission was appointed? Will he bear in mind that if he were to come forward with a really effective Measure, it would receive support from this side of the House, so that there is no excuse for the Government in delaying this matter on account of lack of Parliamentary time?

Mr. Thorneycroft

I will certainly give consideration to any changes which might usefully be made in the Commission, but I dealt with the prospect of forthcoming legislation in a debate some time ago