§ 32. Mr. Jayasked the Chancellor of the Exchequer to make a statement on the Government's policy towards increases of dividends by companies.
§ Mr. R. A. ButlerThe Government's policy towards dividends remains the same as that which I explained to the House on 7th November, 1951, when I spoke in the debate on the Address.
§ Mr. JayAs so much more of the taxpayer's money has been spent on Treasury Bill interest, will the right hon. Gentleman say whether he regards the increase in dividend by the National Provincial Bank as in accordance with Government policy?
§ Mr. ButlerThere is a Question or, that which comes next, and, therefore, I do not think that I ought to answer the right hon. Gentleman.
§ Mr. JayCannot the Chancellor say now? It is a perfectly simple question: does he regard that as in accordance with Government policy, or not?
§ Mr. ButlerI do not know, Mr Speaker, whether I should be in order in answering a Question which is coming next. If I am in order, I will certainly say to the right hon. Gentleman that I have no intention whatever of—
§ Mr. SpeakerAs the next Question covers the same ground, perhaps the hon. Member who put it down ought to be allowed to ask it.
§ 33. Mr. Anthony Greenwoodasked tile Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will 23 take steps to ensure that joint stock banks do not increase their dividends without his approval.
§ Mr. R. A. ButlerNo, Sir.
§ Mr. GreenwoodWith the permission of my right hon. Friend, may I ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer whether, in view of the fact that the cost of living has increased during the past year and the Chancellor is calling upon the work-people to exercise restraint in their wage demands, he does not think that it is most unhelpful of the National Provincial Bank to increase its dividends?
§ Mr. ButlerI have nothing to go back upon in the statement I made in the debate on the Address regarding the general attitude of the Government towards the importance of restraining dividend policy, but I am not going to put myself in the position of criticising or attempting to control the activities of the National Provincial Bank.
§ Mr. GreenwoodDoes the right hon. Gentleman really think that he should appeal to trade unionists to exercise restraint when he is not prepared to make any appeal to the banks?
§ Mr. ButlerThe hon. Member is rather exaggerating. I have already said that I adhere to the statement which I made for the Government that restraint in dividend policy is desirable, but I am not prepared to answer the hon. Member by saying that I will take steps to ensure that the banks do not increase their dividends, because I do not desire to take steps.
§ Sir H. WilliamsIs it not the case that the purchasing value of the dividend recently declared by the Bank is half of the dividend that they declared in 1939?
§ Mr. ButlerI should not like to give an exact answer to that.
§ Mr. PagetDoes the Chancellor of the Exchequer really think that it is fair to take off food subsidies in order to give them to the banks in increased Treasury Bill interest and then to have the banks hand it on in increased dividends?
§ Mr. ButlerIf the hon. and learned Member believes that sort of clap-trap, he will believe anything.