§ 1. Mr. Shepherdasked the Chancellor of the Exchequer to what extent the Treasury is now facilitating United Kingdom investment in Canada.
§ The Economic Secretary to the Treasury (Mr. R. Maudling)It is clearly in our interest to facilitate United Kingdom participation in Canadian development, and we stand ready to provide dollars, within the limits of our resources, for direct investment in productive enterprises which will benefit our balance of payments. We cannot at present afford to allow portfolio investment.
§ Mr. ShepherdAs these facilities have been in existence for some time and are not generally known, can my hon. Friend devise means whereby publicity is given to them?
§ Mr. MaudlingMy impression is that these facilities are fairly well known and we have been heartened to see the development that has taken place recently. So far in 1953 the amount authorised for investment in Canada has been about £17½ million. I am grateful to my hon. Friend for any additional help in giving publicity to this matter.
§ Mr. Ellis SmithIn view of the proposed development of hydro-electrification in Canada, is special attention being 1372 given to the need for credit facilities to enable industry in this country to play its part?
§ Mr. MaudlingThe difficulty is not one of credit facilities, but of the availability of Canadian dollars. We are anxious at all times to consider any suggestion put forward by people wanting to invest in Canada.
§ Mr. GrimondWill the hon. Gentleman make it clear that these facilities are for new investment and go beyond the mere transferring from one type of investment to another?
§ Mr. MaudlingYes, Sir. This is for new investment, and it is direct investment.
§ 2. Mr. Shepherdasked the Chancellor of the Exchequer the value, at current prices, of British overseas investments.
§ Mr. MaudlingNo reliable estimate of the current value of our overseas investments is available.
§ Mr. ShepherdFrom the figures given at the Washington loan negotiations and the annual payments of interest received by this country, would my hon. Friend say that these investments must be about £5,000 million?
§ Mr. MaudlingI would not like to give figures. Although it is true that the Bank of England publish periodical investment estimates of the nominal value of overseas investments, there is no reliable indication of the current market value.
§ Mr. Emrys HughesIs the Minister aware that some British companies invest sums in Canada and thus escape paying the Excess Profits Levy? Is he aware that this was so in the case of the Hawker-Siddeley Company, which is manufacturing a new bomber?
§ Mr. MaudlingI cannot accept the hon. Member's interpretation of the operation of the Excess Profits Levy.