HC Deb 11 November 1952 vol 507 cc750-1
22. Mr. Janney

asked the Minister of Labour what steps he is taking to prevent a recurrence of cases similar to that of 22702478 Private J. E. Smith, of Leicester, who was called to National Service in the Army when he had a serious defect of the foot necessitating a major operation, and who is now to be discharged from the Army; and whether he will exempt from National Service in the Army men suffering from chronic illnesses or serious physical disabilities.

Mr. Watkinson

I am satisfied that the decision of the National Service Medical Board, reached after a most careful examination of his foot, that Private Smith was fit for sedentary duties in the Army was correct. His discharge was due to a worsening of his condition after entry. Men who, on account of their medical condition, cannot be employed in the Services are not called up.

Mr. Janner

Surely the Minister is aware that that is not the correct answer to this Question, and that in fact—[Interruption.] Is the Minister not aware of the fact that the orthopaedic specialist at the Leicester Infirmary declared that this man was not fit for service and that he brought that statement to the notice of the Medical Board at the time; that they made no inquiry of this specialist at all so far as anyone is aware, and will the Minister see to it that the money of the country and the time of these people is not wasted in cases of this kind?

Mr. Watkinson

I think the hon. Member was misled by the fact that undoubtedly Private Smith was awaiting an operation on his foot. But while he was awaiting that operation he was still able to walk two miles a day.

Mr. Janner

But is the Minister aware that I am not satisfied with that reply, and will he be good enough to look into the papers again to see what is the actual position?

Mr. Watkinson

indicated assent.

Mr. Bellenger

Does not the hon. Gentleman recognise that there is a serious point of principle at stake here? He said in his answer that this man was called up for certain duties and his condition worsened during his military service. Thereby he would become prima facie entitled to a pension because of aggravation. Will the hon. Gentleman be careful about calling up such men, who can only be a burden to the taxpayer?

Mr. Watkinson

indicated assent.