§ 44. Mr. Kenneth Thompsonasked the Minister of Transport if he has considered a report on the freight-handling industry prepared by the Aims of Industry Limited, a copy of which has been sent to him; and if he will now initiate discussions with the trades unions and employers' organisations concerned, together with the National Dock Labour Board, to secure improvements in the rate of cargo handling at British ports.
§ Mr. MaclayI have a copy of this report. As I indicated in my answer to Questions by my hon. Friend the Member for Woolwich, West (Mr. Steward) and other hon. Members on 3rd March, my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for the Co-ordination of Transport, Fuel and Power and I have been giving this 1920 matter our urgent consideration and, following my right hon. Friend's announcement in another place on 11th March, the Ports Efficiency Committee, has been set up to investigate port working in the United Kingdom.
§ Mr. ThompsonWhile thanking my hon. Friend for his answer and the sympathetic attention which he has given to this problem, may I draw his attention to the great urgency of this matter, and particularly to the report of the Liverpool Steamship Owners' Association which was issued a few days ago, which stresses the urgency of this same point?
§ Mr. MaclayMy hon. Friend will realise, I am sure, that my right hon. Friend's statement means that we fully recognise the urgency of the situation.
§ Mr. R. J. MellishIs the Minister aware that there is disquiet about some of the appointments to this committee? Not one member of this committee is a dock worker. I should also like to know why this statement has come from another place and not from this House of Commons where Questions could have been asked on this matter last week.
§ Mr. MaclayI feel that the composition of the committee is as good as it could possibly be in the circumstances. It is a very strong body, and I would point out in addition that there will be consultations between that committee and the interested parties throughout the proceedings.
§ Mr. John PatonIs it not the case that Aims of Industry Ltd. is merely an instrument for the dissemination of Tory propaganda, and that it does not help in a difficult question of this kind to give special publicity to such partisan opinion?
§ Mr. ThompsonIs it not a fact that all the statements contained in the report prepared by Aims of Industry Ltd. are nevertheless true and are supported by evidence?
§ Mr. SpeakerThis seems to be a matter for debate.
§ Mr. MellishIn view of the very unsatisfactory nature of the reply, and the fact that it will not do the docks industry a great deal of good, I wish to give notice that I will raise the matter on the Adjournment at the first opportunity.