§ 52. Mr. M. Stewartasked the Minister of Works what revision he has made of the regulations governing retirement for employees in his Department.
§ Mr. EcclesNone, Sir.
§ Mr. StewartHow does the Minister reconcile that with the statement, made to me in a letter a fortnight ago, that he was revising the regulations in his Department?
§ Mr. EcclesI think the hon. Gentleman is really not talking of retirement, which is the word used in the Question, but of the rules for the discharge of employees on engineering maintenance when there is not enough work, which is a different question.
§ Mr. StewartDoes the Minister not agree that what he is doing is making an alteration which is affecting the employment of older people in his Department? If so, how does he reconcile that with the recent statement by the Minister of Labour on the need for men to remain at work longer?
§ Mr. EcclesThe hon. Gentleman is really asking an entirely different question, which is not about retirement at all, but perhaps I may be allowed to answer it. The only change I have made is in the London area, where we are treating the whole area as one. That is to say, if there is not enough work in one 990 depôt we are discharging a man over 65 in another depôt, although that depot has enough work, to make room for the younger man. That is the only change which has been made.
§ Mr. GibsonBefore the right hon. Gentleman changes these regulations, even for the London area, will he give an assurance that the Whitley Council or the trade unions will be consulted before these changes are made?
§ Mr. EcclesThey have been, and they agreed.