40. Mr. J. T. Priceasked the Minister of Transport if he is aware that, in the opinion of the vast majority of drivers, cats-eye road markers make a valuable contribution to safety particularly in foggy weather; why, in view of this, he is removing them from roads under his control; and if he will ensure that these studs are retained.
§ Mr. MaclayI am aware of the value of reflecting studs, and I am not removing them from trunk roads as a matter of general policy. The hon. Member may have in mind a case in which studs have not been replaced after re-surfacing because the street lighting made them unnecessary.
Mr. PriceMay I ask the Minister to reconsider the removal of any studs where they have already been installed? Is he not aware that, in the opinion of the great majority of people who use the roads, these reflecting studs are the most brilliant invention which has ever been produced in the interests of road safety, and, in view of the fact that over 4,000 people a week are being run down on the roads, does he not think that he ought to take any measures which will reduce these accidents?
§ Mr. MaclayYes, Sir. I am convinced that these studs are extremely valuable, but there may be conditions of lighting where they are not so necessary, and that is the point of the case which the hon. Gentleman has in mind.
Mr. PriceMay I pursue this matter in one further direction? May I ask the Minister to give us an assurance that the removal of these studs is not linked in any way with a financial consideration, and that money is not being saved by their removal?
§ Mr. MaclayThere has been no question of the consideration to which the hon. Gentleman has referred.
§ Sir R. GlynWill the Minister draw the attention of the War Office to the fact that, when tracked vehicles go along these roads, they destroy these studs, which places a very heavy burden on the local rates, and may I ask if some adjustment will be made?
§ Mr. MaclayI will certainly examine what my hon. Friend has said.